Archive for May 2013

Stop the Violence: How to Prevent Workplace Violence

workplace violenceThe recent acts of violence that transpired in Newtown, Connecticut and during the Boston Marathon shed light on the reality that violence can strike at any time, on any occasion. These tragic events allow us to reflect on the current safety precautions in place to ensure similar situations do not occur. As a result, many employers are seeking measures to safeguard the workplace from violence.

Nearly two million American workers are victims of workplace violence each year. Workplace violence is defined as any act or threat of physical violence, harassment, intimidation, or other threatening disruptive behavior that occurs at the work site. The spectrum for what is considered violent behavior in the workplace ranges from threats and verbal abuse to physical assaults and even homicide.

 Most workplace violence incidents can be categorized into one of the four types.

Criminal Intent: Perpetrator does not have a relationship with the business or its employees. Generally, the motive for this type of violence is robbery, shoplifting and trespassing. A vast majority of workplace homicides (85%) fall into this category.

Customer or Client: Perpetrator is a customer or a client who becomes violent during the course of business. Patients, students, vendors and inmates are included in this category. Patient caregivers are often victims of this type of violence.

Worker-to-Worker: Perpetrator is an employee or past employee who attacks another employee or former employee in the workplace. Worker-to-worker incidents account for approximately 7% of all workplace violence homicides. 

Personal Relationship: Perpetrator does not have a business relationship with the organization but has a personal relationship with the victim. This type of violence is typically related to domestic violence.

Employer’s Responsibility

Research indicates the risk of violence can escalate for certain employees depending on the nature of work performed. Employees, who work alone or in isolated areas, work with volatile, unstable people or exchange money with the public are at a higher risks to encounter violence at work. Furthermore, the time of day the employee works and location of work are also risk factors that contribute to higher rates of workplace violence. For example, employees who work late at night and in areas with high crimes are more likely to experience violence at work.

Despite the nature of work performed, time of day or location of work, employers are held responsible for providing a work environment free from violence. Under the General Duty Clause, outlined by OSHA, employers are required to provide a workplace “free from recognizable hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious harm to employees”. The most effective way an employer can prevent workplace violence is through proactive measures to discourage threats before it occurs.  

Best Practices for Preventative Measures

Zero – Tolerance Policy

Implement a zero tolerance policy for workplace violence that covers employees, family members and associates of employees, clients, visitors, contractors, and vendors that come in contact with company personnel. 


Advocate reporting of violent acts regardless of the level of damage produced. Minor violent conflicts that are unaddressed can manifest into major issues. Sometimes intervening early in a conflict may result in a resolution before the problem gets out of control. The reporting process should maintain the confidentiality of the employee’s identity as to encourage individuals to speak out without the threat of retaliation. Reports should include information about the place, time, cause and type of incident as well as a list of all parties involved along with their statements.

Behaviors of Concern

Educate employees and management to detect behaviors of concern and report conflicts to the appropriate personnel. Behaviors of concern that suggest a potential problem include: 

  • Threats, frequent aggressive outbursts, or excessive displays of temper
  • Display of  an ominous fascination with weapons and/or references to weapons, violent media content, or violent events
  • Display of verbal abuse to co-workers, clients, visitors, contractors etc. 
  • Use of offensive jokes or comments about violent acts
  • Inability to handle criticism or socialize with others
  •  Use of excuses and lack of ownership for mistakes

Employee Assistance Program

The use of an Employee Assistance Program can assist to deter violent behavior. Employee Assistance Programs provide employees with a haven to discuss personal and professional struggles, or connect with third-party assistance programs such as anger management organizations.

Background Checks

Implementing a background check policy that is consistent for all members in the organization can pinpoint potential behaviors of concern. If applied, background checks must comply with federal and state regulations to allow applicants the opportunity to explain reasoning for the behavior in question.

Environmental Precautions

Safety measures including adjusting lighting, safeguarding entrances and exits and maintaining security hardware can help discourage “would-be” assailants. 


Most Common Violent Behaviors in the Workplace

Inappropriate Language (e.g., Vulgarity)
Verbal Abuse
Verbal Threats of Violence
Sexual Harassment

Source: SHRM: Workplace Violence Survey  

A Compelling Time for Topgrading: Managing Performance and Managing Your Budget

TopgradingLeading companies maintain their competitive advantage by hiring the best and brightest employees and then establishing a culture that focuses on advancing and retaining these “A” players. In his book Topgrading, Bradford D. Smart outlines the methodical approach to identify, select and develop top talent as a deliberate business strategy. When executed, this strategy allows companies to outperform the competition and thus impact the bottom line in a positive manner. If topgrading is an unarguable framework for business success, then there is no time like the present to reevaluate the talent pool and make sure that a company’s investment in human capital creates a positive return and enhances the overall success of the business.

There is nothing easy about topgrading!  In fact, Smart states that the structure and discipline needed to ensure that individuals gain and hold that talent edge is not for the “fainthearted.”  Thus, the systematic approach needs to flow from the CEO through all leadership and into every rank and file member that maintains value to the overall success of an organization.  Employees who are not performing value-added work should be evaluated through objective measures. The approach cannot be one that relies upon subjective evaluation. There must be clearly defined and measurable ways to identify the top performers. In addition, there must be opportunities to engage performers who have designated potential in meaningful learning and coaching opportunities to ensure that they reach their full potential.   

Organizations must develop and incorporate a systematic approach to talent acquisition and management.  This may require a complete overhaul of the current recruitment process as talent acquisition requires a comprehensive screening process that incorporates assessments and multiple levels of interviews to ensure applicants are obtained from reliable sources and candidates are screened with proficiency. All employees must be consistently evaluated using performance management tools that contain core and cultural competencies that clearly establish a base line of expectations regarding character, professionalism and job responsibility. Employees must be fully engaged in their own development and receive continuous constructive feedback from superiors and peers. Establishing a structure for increased engagement, leads to increased performance.  According to a 2010 Gallup Consulting analysis, companies with high levels of employee engagement have 3.9 times the Earnings Per Share (EPS) rate than similar industry groups with lower level employee engagement. This is yet another compelling reason to top grade and manage performance with diligence.

As a business owner, there is no time like the present to reevaluate your human capital. The largest budget line for any organization is salaries and benefits. The changing landscape of the economy and increasing governmental regulations should compel any organization to begin the journey to human resource optimization which remains as one of the greatest resources of competitive advantage. Employers should focus on reviewing the price of maintaining the status quo or assessing the performance level of every employee to ensure a positive return on investment. Increased spending is inevitable so ensuring that there is a return on this large investment is critical. Maintaining your competitive advantage is the reason a company stays in business.

Written by Greta Cairns, Director of SCI Atlanta Operations

Posted May 21, 2013 by scicompanies in Employment Law